architecture

The architectural output is conceived as an iterative translation rather than a fixed object. Forms are tested as spatial elements (screen, relief, envelope) where density, porosity, and layering can be tuned without losing the underlying botanical logic.

Placed back into a landscape context, the project becomes a field test: the translated forms negotiate between resistance and erosion, between what asserts itself and what slowly dissolves. The parametric model functions as a mediating layer between observation and spatial speculation. It translates the qualities of the body into adjustable systems, allowing form to shift without losing its internal logic. Parametrization keeps the model in a state of becoming.

principle

The project is guided by the tension between permanence and impermanence, understanding time as a dual condition. Permanence appears as resistance, storage, and timelessness, while impermanence manifests through erosion, imprint, and gradual transformation. This contrast generates a spatial field in which questions of what remains and what dissolves are translated into architectural concepts such as porosity, layering, and filtering.
The methodology operates as a back-and-forth engineering process, a bidirectional exchange between analysis and design. References and natural forms are read in reverse to uncover underlying material and structural logics, while scans and observations are translated forward into lines, rules, and architectural elements. This continuous feedback loop sharpens the spatial logic, allowing form to emerge through iterative verification rather than linear progression.